<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Digital Agency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedigitalagency.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedigitalagency.com</link>
	<description>Listen, watch, learn, respond.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>One Hour Per Second</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2012/01/one-hour-per-second/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2012/01/one-hour-per-second/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paulb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalagency.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wonder how much content is loaded to YouTube? YouTube has officially hit a HUGE milestone&#8230;.. every second and hour of video content is uploaded to YouTube! That means 24 hours every 24 seconds That means a decade a day! That me&#8230;.. you get the picture. Video content is still a digital marketers paradise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wonder how much content is loaded to YouTube?</p>
<p>YouTube has officially hit a HUGE milestone&#8230;.. every second and hour of video content is uploaded to YouTube! That means 24 hours every 24 seconds<br />
That means a decade a day!<br />
That me&#8230;.. you get the picture.</p>
<p>Video content is still a digital marketers paradise.</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sHPfc6whaSk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2012/01/one-hour-per-second/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOPA and the internet blackout</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2012/01/sopa-and-the-internet-blackout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2012/01/sopa-and-the-internet-blackout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paulb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boingboing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[january18th]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sopa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalagency.com/?p=309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Wikipedia, Reddit and Boing Boing are only three of the big names confirming they will be going &#8216;black&#8217; on January the 18th&#8230;. but why? PIPA, the Protect IP Act in the US Senate and SOPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act, have been presented as a way to protect movie studios, record labels and others [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So <a href="http://www.wikipedia.com" title="Wikipedia" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>, <a href="http://www.reddit.com" title="Reddit" target="_blank">Reddit</a> and <a href="http://boingboing.net/" title="Boing Boing" target="_blank">Boing Boing</a> are only three of the big names confirming they will be going &#8216;black&#8217; on January the 18th&#8230;. but why? PIPA, the Protect IP Act in the US Senate and SOPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act, have been presented as a way to protect movie studios, record labels and others from digital piracy. Supporters range from the Country Music Association to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. However, the Internet giants say the bills could require your Internet provider to block websites that are involved in digital file sharing and search engines such as Google, Yahoo and Bing could be stopped from linking to them &#8211; removing the ideal of an &#8216;open internet&#8217;.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you want an Internet where human rights, free speech and the rule of law are not subordinated to the entertainment industry&#8217;s profits, I hope you&#8217;ll join us,&#8221; said Cory Doctorow of Boing Boing.</p>
<p>Internet entities such as Wikipedia, Google, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit and Tumblr said the two bills would force them to be online police and hold them responsible if users of their sites link to pirated content. Not an easy task!</p>
<p>“While I support their goal of reducing copyright infringement (which I don’t believe these acts would accomplish), I am shocked that our lawmakers would contemplate such measures that would put us on a par with the most oppressive nations in the world,” said Sergey Brin, one of the co-founders of Google, in a December post on Google+.</p>
<p>Here at The Digital Agency we are on the fence with this one. Copyright infringement is a serious offence and we do whatever we can to ensure our client&#8217;s digital properties and intellectual property is protected against any piracy acts, however holding some of the world leaders in digital innovation is not the ideal solution. Although this is a US ruling, it will effect the internet as we know it (as in it&#8217;s essence it is the WORLD WIDE web and not just the USWEB!). By passing this bill, search engine optimisation and back linking projects will be effected world wide and could disrupt internet usage as well as your own website ranking quite significantly. If you are worried about how this could effect your site or want more information on PIPA or SOPA just give the team here a shout or discuss it with us on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedigitalagency" title="Facebook" target="_blank">Facebook</a> or <a href="http://www.twitter.com/digitalagencynz" title="Twitter" target="_blank">Twitter</a>!</p>
<p>Check out Boing Boing&#8217;s Cory Doctorows explanation in this video -</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/31100268" width="584" height="329" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2012/01/sopa-and-the-internet-blackout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social media influences purchase behaviour</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/10/social-media-influences-purchase-behaviour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/10/social-media-influences-purchase-behaviour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paulb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalagency.com/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purchase cycle has changed dynamically in this generation due to the influx of digital sources now available for scouring information. What do you do before making a &#8216;major&#8217; purchase? Do you call a friend? Search on Google? Post on Facebook? Buy a magazine? Depending on the purchase you may have lots of information at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purchase cycle has changed dynamically in this generation due to the influx of digital sources now available for scouring information. What do you do before making a &#8216;major&#8217; purchase? Do you call a friend? Search on Google? Post on Facebook? Buy a magazine? Depending on the purchase you may have lots of information at hand, however often you won&#8217;t!<span id="more-255"></span></p>
<p>Social media has infiltrated the purchasing funnel helping consumers make purchases from what to have to lunch to where to go on holiday! Depending on what you need to know, sometimes you turn to Google and sometimes you turn to your social graph. Is your brand available across the relevant online channels in order to target your perfect audience? Regardless of what type of consumer you are targeting, people will either search or ask a friend so your SEO/SEM must be focussed on in order to turn those in the search stage of the buying cycle towards your brand. In order to target those in the social funnel it is essential that you know the different types of consumers on platforms such as Facebook. An interesting study by <a href="http://www.mbooth.com/">MBooth</a> and Beyond analyzes the differences between high and low sharers.</p>
<p>The social consumer -</p>
<p>53% use Facebook to interact with a brand.<br />
40% liked a product on Facebook<br />
20% use Facebook to Research products at least once a week<br />
42% wrote an online post about a product or a brand</p>
<p>The analysis compares the &#8216;high sharer&#8217; with the &#8216;low sharer&#8217;. If you are likely to &#8216;share&#8217; a lot on Facebook, what does that mean about you as a consumer? High sharers only represent 20% of the users on Facebook as opposed to low sharers. What does that mean for you?</p>
<p>High sharers are -<br />
Younger<br />
They recommend products<br />
They are generally brand loyal<br />
They own multiple internet devices</p>
<p>As opposed to low sharers -<br />
They are older<br />
They research high involvement products<br />
Care more about quality than brand (less likely to share to be in the &#8216;cool group&#8217;)<br />
Open to change&#8230;<br />
More likely to make a purchase on a researched product.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedigitalagency.com/wp-content/uploads/Screen-Shot-2011-10-27-at-10.04.59-AM1.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-265" title="The Social Consumer" src="http://www.thedigitalagency.com/wp-content/uploads/Screen-Shot-2011-10-27-at-10.04.59-AM1.png" alt="" width="600" height="596" /></a></p>
<p>As you can see, people will trust their friends recommendations or a brand with consumer interaction (where they can ask a question) for personal products like baby and beauty) &#8211; however review sites or blog posts are less relevant as a consumer cannot tell if it is a genuine statement or a subjective advertorial. Notice the importance of search throughout the social funnel. By disregarding the bread and butter of consumer research (search) you put your brand at risk of not being exposed to the consumer through their decision making process. Facebook &#8211; has the most influence on &#8216;baby&#8217; brands, YouTube &#8211; has the most influence on &#8216;music&#8217; brands, Review sites &#8211; have the most influence on &#8216;electronics&#8217; brands</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedigitalagency.com/wp-content/uploads/Actions_taken_after_online_interaction1.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-266" title="Actions_taken_after_online_interaction" src="http://www.thedigitalagency.com/wp-content/uploads/Actions_taken_after_online_interaction1.png" alt="" width="600" height="433" /></a></p>
<p>The emphasis on search as being still the main way people research products might be a reality but it’s fast being challenged by social, word-of-mouth referrals from the people we trust must in our lives, our friends/family. The advent of Sponsored Stories in Facebook’s new plans may continue to erode the dominance of search as the means by which people research products as prep for purchases however it is always going to part of the cycle.</p>
<p>Knowing where your consumers are is essential&#8230; you can&#8217;t target them if you don&#8217;t know how to get in touch. For advertisers, business owners, marketeers or anybody wanting to acquire new customers &#8211; socialmedia/digital offers great opportunities to get in touch with them. <a href="http://www.thedigitalagency.com/contact/">Talk to us today</a> to find out more.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/10/social-media-influences-purchase-behaviour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s Advertising Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/10/facebooks-advertising-generation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/10/facebooks-advertising-generation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paulb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalagency.com/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook has finally decided to follow the Google style with it&#8217;s new advertising strategy! The social networking giant is not trying to reinvent the wheel when it comes to online advertising, nor are they doing anything overly innovative however &#8211; making the transition from advertising as a message-delivering medium to a platform for social sharing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook has finally decided to follow the Google style with it&#8217;s new advertising strategy! The social networking giant is not trying to reinvent the wheel when it comes to online advertising, nor are they doing anything overly innovative however &#8211; making the transition from advertising as a message-delivering medium to a platform for social sharing is a radical departure for the normally traditional online giants. <span id="more-246"></span></p>
<p>Facebook&#8217;s new strategy aims on turning partners (brands/advertisers) into better social media communicators and gets Facebook members to start recommending and sharing advertisers as much as they do their holiday pics or what they are having for lunch.</p>
<p>For the Google vs Facebook comparisons? Google built an empire, however that empire started with a tool which although offered a great service &#8211; it didnt generate any revenue. Google at first didn’t know how it would make money. Founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin figured that if they built a better mousetrap, the money would eventually flow. And it did. Facebook have done the same. Facebook figured out that if it got enough people on board and continually improved it&#8217;s social network, eventually it would figure out how to make money.</p>
<p>In 2007 they introduced their first, clumsy advertising platform &#8211; which has not evolved much howeverr Facebook are certainly cashing in. Now, however, Facebook’s ad strategy is becoming clear. And it’s not only brilliant, it’s unexpected. Facebook’s strategy, like Google’s, is to not only improve its network and experience, but improve the advertising as well. Now, that’s not so clever, admittedly. The really interesting part is the way Facebook plans to improve it: by making brand Pages better.</p>
<p>Why? Facebook doesn’t make a dime on any of the Pages set up by advertisers. As a marketer, you could do quite well for yourself by running a brand Page and never buying a single ad. But you could only do <em>so</em> well. The reason you will have to buy ads on Facebook goes to the heart of why you need to advertise in the first place. The Digital Agency are always learning and researching the best ways for brands to capitalise on the growth of social media and the changes that Facebook put in place. Contact us today to discuss what you can do.</p>
<p>Last week Facebook are announced 2 new updates to their platform. No 1 &#8211; Expandable ad units. No 2 &#8211; new metrics to tell you &#8216;what people are talking about&#8217;. We will continue to utilize these new tools with our clients and let you know how it goes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/10/facebooks-advertising-generation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A lot can happen online in 60 seconds</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/a-lot-can-happen-online-in-60-seconds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/a-lot-can-happen-online-in-60-seconds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 23:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paulb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tda.stompboxdev.net/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The online world has connected everybody together on numerous devices. You can access the World Wide Web at home, on the road, in your car, in the office and even in the bathtub or through your refrigerator if you really feel the need to! This dynamic growth of connectivity allows a lot of things to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The online world has connected everybody together on numerous devices. You can access the World Wide Web at home, on the road, in your car, in the office and even in the bathtub or through your refrigerator if you really feel the need to! This dynamic growth of connectivity allows a lot of things to happen in 60 seconds!<span id="more-164"></span></p>
<p>In 60 seconds -</p>
<ul>
<li>700K search queries are typed into Google</li>
<li>168 million emails are sent</li>
<li>700K Facebook status updates are made</li>
<li>Firefox has over 1700 downloads</li>
<li>Over 13K iPhone applications are downloaded</li>
<li>320 new Twitter accounts are created and over 100K tweets are sent</li>
<li>25 hours of video content is added to YouTube</li>
</ul>
<p>We could go on…..</p>
<p>The team here at The Digital Agency believe that all of this activity is a direct result of the connectivity we have in today’s world. According to Steve Bennett, this global mobile device surge has led to - “a perfect storm of technologies coming together that combine local, social, photo and mobile (or said another way LoSoPhoMo).” Steve continues: “with the market for smart phones significantly larger than PC-based models, mobile – particularly LoSoPhoMo – is where we’ll see the greatest innovation in the years ahead.”</p>
<p>Is your business ‘losophomo’ accessible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/a-lot-can-happen-online-in-60-seconds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Links last longer on YouTube than Facebook?</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/links-on-youtube/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/links-on-youtube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gbotica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tda.stompboxdev.net/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spreading content around the web? Which social media platform will give you the longevity you crave? When trying to spread content around the web, where you post your links really does matter. A recent study by link-shortening service Bit.ly reveals some interesting statistics about the rise, fall and fizzle out time of these links depending [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Spreading content around the web? Which social media platform will give you the longevity you crave?</strong></p>
<p>When trying to spread content around the web, where you post your links really does matter. A recent study by link-shortening service Bit.ly reveals some interesting statistics about the rise, fall and fizzle out time of these links depending on what platform they are posted on.<span id="more-46"></span><strong></strong></p>
<p>Bit.ly Chief Scientist <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://mashable.com/2011/09/06/links-sharing-bitly/">Hilary Mason</a></span> has used a scientific concept from nuclear physics ‘Half Life’ to explain the patterns on how people clicked on 1,000 popular bit.ly links across Facebook, Twitter and Youtube. Mason deciphered half life as being – ‘the amount of time at which a link will receive half of the clicks it will ever receive after it reached its peak’ – as reported by <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://mashable.com/2011/09/06/links-sharing-bitly/">Mashable</a></span>.<strong></strong></p>
<p>We all accept that links to popular stories will become irrelevant and unimportant after a certain period of time, that is why we use micro blogging services like Twitter to make short, snappy statements that we hope will spread to a wide audience in a short amount of time. If they don’t, they fall down the pecking order of importance and fizzle away. However, what if the message is really important and we want it to last as long as possible? Is Twitter, or Facebook, the best option?</p>
<p>Mason and her team discovered that the only predictors on the longevity of the life of a link, is where it gets shared and what the content of the link is. The ‘half-life’ of a link on Facebook is, on average, 24 minutes longer than the same link on Twitter.  Links in emails and instant messages remain even slightly longer than those in Facebook!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedigitalagency.com.php5-24.dfw1-2.websitetestlink.com/2011/09/links-on-youtube/bit-ly_link_length/" rel="attachment wp-att-104"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-104" title="bit.ly_link_length" src="http://www.thedigitalagency.com/wp-content/uploads/bit.ly_link_length.jpg" alt="Link Life" width="640" height="396" /></a></p>
<p>Good to know! As an individual or a business trying to spread a message quickly, to a wide audience  whilst still maintaining some longevity of traffic – the above are decent options…. but what about YouTube? YouTube, it has been discovered, has an entirely different kind of linking pattern – ‘Whereas the average half life for the 1,000 links on Twitter, Facebook and email/IM was three hours, the average half life on YouTube for the same links was 7.4 hours.’ &#8211; Mason</p>
<p>We don’t believe that YouTube is necessarily better than Facebook, or Facebook better than Twitter to post something that you want people to see quickly – all platforms have different dynamics. All of the platforms above can co-exist and work at their best when utilized together. It is time you considered YouTube and Twitter into your entry level social marketing activity – if you haven’t already.</p>
<h2></h2>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/links-on-youtube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook for iPhone gets privacy upgrades</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/facebookupgrades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/facebookupgrades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gbotica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tda.stompboxdev.net/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa.

Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Facebook updates its iPhone app with a lot of new security features which mirror the enhancements to it&#8217;s new site facelift.</h2>
<p>With the new <a href="http://mashable.com/2011/09/06/facebook-iphone-privacy/#25171Update-Notes">Facebook for iPhone 3.5</a>, you can tag your friends and places in posts, and share external links from the web view. It also makes it easier to control who can see each post you make (like on Facebook.com). With a huge percentage of users now accessing social networks through their iPhones,these updates were essential for the continued safety of its users as well as driving sustained usability into the pockets of people all over the world.<br />
<span id="more-49"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/facebookupgrades/img_1529/" rel="attachment wp-att-143"><img class="size-full wp-image-143 aligncenter" title="FacebookMobile3.5" src="http://www.thedigitalagency.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG_1529.png" alt="FacebookMobile3.5" width="298" height="448" /></a></p>
<p>With Facebook now saying that over 250 million unique users visit the site  via their phone monthly, the market for mobile Facebook is not small! We here at The Digital Agency HQ think these new upgrades are only another step in the right direction for Facebook and that number will continue to grow on a hourly basis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/facebookupgrades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retailers to introduce &#8216;try-on&#8217; fees?</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/demo-post-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/demo-post-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gbotica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tda.stompboxdev.net/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australian retailers introduce charging consumers to try on clothes. The recent battle between bricks and mortar traditional retailers and ‘clicks’ and mortar online retailers has come to a serious peak! With their backs against the wall, retailers are feeling forced to employ ‘charging to try on clothes’ strategies as they can no longer afford to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Australian retailers introduce charging consumers to try on clothes.</strong></p>
<p>The recent battle between bricks and mortar traditional retailers and ‘clicks’ and mortar online retailers has come to a serious peak! With their backs against the wall, retailers are feeling forced to employ ‘charging to try on clothes’ strategies as they can no longer afford to have the casual shopper spend time trying on, sizing up, questioning the sales assistant then heading home to purchase online from overseas retailers often, for a lower price.<span id="more-44"></span></p>
<p>We can blame it on online shopping, the global financial crunch or the dynamically changing value of the dollar, however, no matter what we blame it on the facts are simple – Australian clothing and footwear sales declined 4.8% in 2011. Is charging try-on fees that consumers get back if they make the purchase the right approach? Are bricks and mortar stores offering enough service to warrant this fee? The fact is that retailers can no longer just fill their racks and wait for the customers to come rolling in, they need to offer a point of difference that defines their brand and gives consumers a taste of something different when they visit their store.</p>
<p>In the Sydney Morning Herald, Katherine Milesi, a partner at Deloitte’s online practice, believes that high street retailers can happily co-exist with e-commerce offerings in the new digital world. They simply need to differentiate what they provide and the way in which they provide it.</p>
<p>At The Digital Agency we firmly agree with Katherine Milesi. We don’t believe that it is a battle between the two that somebody needs to win, but more simply a new dimension that all retailers should explore in offering to their loyal consumers. A combined ‘package’ of offerings that includes online, offline and social networking. Our belief is that nothing will replace that sensory factor of trying on a new outfit or ‘touching’ a new pair of shoes, something which online cannot offer. However, it needs to be combined with your retail online offering to make that sensory factor just part of the overall shopping experience and not the only enjoyable part.</p>
<p>High end, couture fashion doesn’t face the risk of shoppers leaving the store and making the purchase online to the same extend as high street stores selling mass produced labels however, does that mean we need to punish shoppers who walk into our mid-level retail stores by charging them to try on clothes then leave them out of pocket if they can’t find the ‘right fit’?</p>
<p>As marketers and retailers we need to work together to get the online e-commerce offering in line with our offline traditional incentive and drive both brand and digital leadership in this online generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/demo-post-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NZ online ad spend increases again!</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/nz-adspend-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/nz-adspend-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gbotica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Spend]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tda.stompboxdev.net/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search market grows 22.9% and display 29.6%! According to the IAB PwC Online Expenditure report for Q2 2011 – ad spend is up 19.46% year on year to a total of $84.15m. If you think that figure is startling… it is up from $68.12m in the first quarter of the year, that’s an increase of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><strong>Search market grows 22.9% and display 29.6%!</strong></h1>
<p>According to the IAB PwC Online Expenditure report for Q2 2011 – ad spend is up 19.46% year on year to a total of $84.15m. If you think that figure is startling… it is up from $68.12m in the first quarter of the year, that’s an increase of 22.94%!</p>
<p>New Zealanders are really beginning to grasp the potential that is held in paid search, with search and directories accounting for the biggest increasing channel of online media</p>
<p>Up 34.39% from Q1, 2011 ($25.81m)<br />
Up 34.58% from Q2, 2010 ($21.65m)</p>
<p>Search and directories remain the channel leaders with a 41% total share of the online spend in Q2 2011. There are a lot of contributing factors, but the team here at The Digital Agency firmly believe that the increase in users searching from mobile devices (due to the growth of smartphone and tablet use – particularly with iPhone, Android and the iPad) is certainly helping search engines, particularly Google, increase their foothold in digital media consumption.</p>
<p>With budgets being tightened around the world, marketers are needing to re-assess the way in which they grow their consumer database. Contextual search campaigns with clear and defined acquisition KPIs are allowing marketers to continuously take their learning’s from search advertising and optimise and improve for the future. The Digital Agency are firm believers in CPA based advertising through search and believe it is only going to continue to grow as an essential line in any marketers media budget.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-79" title="searchspend" src="http://www.thedigitalagency.com/wp-content/uploads/searchspend.jpg" alt="" width="665" height="300" /></p>
<p>As a marketer, where are you taking this budget that you are using for search from? It is clearly not from online display, with the market still maintaining a solid growth of 29.6% year on year.</p>
<p>Digital media is changing the way we market our business. Talk to us about how we can help you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedigitalagency.com/2011/09/nz-adspend-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

